Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
Both models 2400G and 2200G are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f10
Core
Raven Ridge
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
13.75k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.58k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.99k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.55k (x0.69)
TOTAL
47.96k
44.87k (x0.94)
Multithread
2400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
50.99k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
84.4k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
18.95k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.2k (x0.57)
TOTAL
198.27k
157.54k (x0.79)
Performance/W
2400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4