Ryzen 5 2400G vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
610f31
Core
Raven Ridge
Richland
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2018
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
9.53k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
8.14k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.45k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
44.15k
24.6k (x0.56)
Multithread
2400G
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
18.2k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
19.33k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
8.42k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.86k (x1.27)
TOTAL
188.49k
49.8k (x0.26)
Performance/W
2400G
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4