Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c1
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
137.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.75k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
17.22k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
9.79k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
8.21k (x2.6)
TOTAL
29.52k
38.97k (x1.32)
Multithread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
9.19k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
35.47k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
19.14k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.82k (x1.93)
TOTAL
122.2k
69.62k (x0.57)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
12.9k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
21.4k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
10.73k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
8.16k (x2.7)
TOTAL
43.01k
53.19k (x1.24)
Multithread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
30.31k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
45.13k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
20.17k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.77k (x1.94)
TOTAL
183.04k
101.38k (x0.55)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
14.65k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
21.57k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
9.93k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
8.02k (x2.36)
TOTAL
44.15k
54.18k (x1.23)
Multithread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
32.14k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
43.54k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
19.58k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
5.61k (x1.85)
TOTAL
188.49k
100.87k (x0.54)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
24.25k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
21.63k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
9.09k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
7.23k (x1.4)
TOTAL
47.96k
62.19k (x1.3)
Multithread
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
56.9k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
55.68k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
19.29k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.09k (x1.09)
TOTAL
198.27k
137.96k (x0.7)
Performance/W
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4