Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i3-1125G4
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806c1
Core
Raven Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
56.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
241.03k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
22.63k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
17.36k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
8.89k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
7.37k (x1.42)
TOTAL
47.96k
56.25k (x1.17)
Multithread
2400G
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
103.42k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
102.39k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
32.17k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.05k (x0.55)
TOTAL
198.27k
241.03k (x1.22)
Performance/W
2400G
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
3657 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
8608 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6116 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1992 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15203 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4