Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0655
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2017
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
28.39k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
24.89k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.78k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
13.19k (x0.79)
TOTAL
58.53k
72.25k (x1.23)
Multithread
1600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
180.2k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
163.51k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
40.6k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
6.48k (x1.26)
TOTAL
303.4k
390.78k (x1.29)
Performance/W
1600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4