Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4.3 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4.3 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
406e3
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
69.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
12.55k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
12.19k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
2.81k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
3.18k (x0.19)
TOTAL
58.53k
30.73k (x0.53)
Multithread
1600
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
29.33k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
28.81k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
6.46k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
5.33k (x1.03)
TOTAL
303.4k
69.94k (x0.23)
Performance/W
1600
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
1956 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
431 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
356 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
4663 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
5459 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
13362 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4