| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.6 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a40f41
Core
Summit Ridge
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
21.04k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
22.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
10.21k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
24.27k (x1.45)
TOTAL
58.53k
77.93k (x1.33)

Multithread

1600

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
158.65k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
215.86k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
89.45k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
14.77k (x2.86)
TOTAL
303.4k
478.73k (x1.58)

Performance/W
1600
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4