Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i7-13700HX
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 3.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 3.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
b06f2
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/24
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
1070.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
48.57k (x3.45)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
28.78k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
15.6k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
16.46k (x0.99)
TOTAL
58.53k
109.41k (x1.87)
Multithread
1600
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
486.01k (x5.61)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
386.1k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
173.21k (x3.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
25.08k (x4.86)
TOTAL
303.4k
1070.39k (x3.53)
Performance/W
1600
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
19462 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4