Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i7-1280P
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 303.4 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906a3
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
58.53k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
303.4k points
468.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
14.08k
39.78k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.56k
26.06k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
12.44k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.71k
13.17k (x0.79)
TOTAL
58.53k
91.45k (x1.56)
Multithread
1600
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
86.62k
209.96k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
168.1k
170.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.51k
72.04k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.16k
16.09k (x3.12)
TOTAL
303.4k
468.3k (x1.54)
Performance/W
1600
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
1333 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2586 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
669 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
4668 points/W
16725 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3911 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6265 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1440 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4642 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
16259 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4