Ryzen 5 1600 vs Xeon W-2223
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
50657
Core
Summit Ridge
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8448 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
25.09k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
20.76k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.07k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
8.76k (x0.58)
TOTAL
56.16k
59.68k (x1.06)
Multithread
1600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
111.43k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
100.2k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
24.67k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
6.89k (x1.01)
TOTAL
272.8k
243.18k (x0.89)
Performance/W
1600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4