Ryzen 5 1600 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.7 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.7 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306f2
Core
Summit Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
18.62k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
10.49k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.04k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
3.26k (x0.21)
TOTAL
56.16k
36.41k (x0.65)
Multithread
1600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
236.25k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
151.05k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
58.9k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
6.7k (x0.99)
TOTAL
272.8k
452.9k (x1.66)
Performance/W
1600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4