Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i7-7700
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
906e9
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
257.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
26.7k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
23.7k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.46k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
11.48k (x0.75)
TOTAL
56.16k
67.33k (x1.2)
Multithread
1600
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
115.97k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
108.43k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
26.28k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
6.85k (x1.01)
TOTAL
272.8k
257.52k (x0.94)
Performance/W
1600
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
1668 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
3962 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
6356 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
2733 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
16032 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4