| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i5-6500


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-6500 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i5-6500 gets 179.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-6500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
506e3
Core
Summit Ridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
53.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
179.44k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
22.89k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
19.87k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.58k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
6.36k (x0.42)
TOTAL
56.16k
53.7k (x0.96)

Multithread

1600

i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
84.36k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
72.91k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
16.08k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
6.1k (x0.9)
TOTAL
272.8k
179.44k (x0.66)

Performance/W
1600
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
247 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
2761 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
i5-6500
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
6359 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
5521 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1271 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
1766 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
14917 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4