Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i5-5200U gets 68.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
306d4
Core
Summit Ridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2017
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
68.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
13.58k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
12.14k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.18k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
2.92k (x0.19)
TOTAL
56.16k
31.81k (x0.57)
Multithread
1600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
28.89k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
28.74k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
7.31k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
3.74k (x0.55)
TOTAL
272.8k
68.69k (x0.25)
Performance/W
1600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1926 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
1916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
488 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
4579 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
5029 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
4497 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1176 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
1080 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
11782 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4