| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 7 5800U


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.2 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a50f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
314.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
18.34k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
22.78k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
9.45k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
20.59k (x1.35)
TOTAL
56.16k
71.16k (x1.27)

Multithread

1600

5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
102.74k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
143.27k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
58.13k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
10.41k (x1.53)
TOTAL
272.8k
314.55k (x1.15)

Performance/W
1600
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
20970 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4