Ryzen 5 1600 vs 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.6 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2017
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
174.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
13.77k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
22.62k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.91k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
4k (x0.26)
TOTAL
56.16k
45.3k (x0.81)
Multithread
1600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
50.44k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
94k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
25.64k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
4.11k (x0.6)
TOTAL
272.8k
174.19k (x0.64)
Performance/W
1600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
11613 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4