| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 1600 vs 5600H


Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
a50f00
Core
Summit Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
255.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
14.34k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
17.67k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
6.41k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
14.95k (x0.98)
TOTAL
56.16k
53.37k (x0.95)

Multithread

1600

5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
83.58k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
119.22k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
48.56k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
3.83k (x0.56)
TOTAL
272.8k
255.19k (x0.94)

Performance/W
1600
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
5671 points/W

Performance/GHz
1600
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4