Ryzen 5 1600 vs A12 9800
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 2.7 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 2.7 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
660f51
Core
Summit Ridge
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
kB
Date
April 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
13.42k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
17.61k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.77k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
3.06k (x0.2)
TOTAL
56.16k
37.86k (x0.67)
Multithread
1600
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
40.46k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
43.18k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
12.78k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
4.37k (x0.64)
TOTAL
272.8k
100.79k (x0.37)
Performance/W
1600
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4