Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 1600 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600 gets a score of 272.8 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
90675
Core
Summit Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
272.8k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
33.85k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
20.33k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
10.51k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.22k
11.77k (x0.77)
TOTAL
56.16k
76.46k (x1.36)
Multithread
1600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
81.03k
174.21k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
145.84k
141.31k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.14k
64.86k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.79k
19.01k (x2.8)
TOTAL
272.8k
399.39k (x1.46)
Performance/W
1600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1247 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2244 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
602 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4197 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3797 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6189 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4228 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
15601 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4