Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 4.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 4.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
a0655
Core
Lucienne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
35.87k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
31.43k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
7.34k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
15.73k (x3.03)
TOTAL
52.35k
90.37k (x1.73)
Multithread
5300U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
377.56k (x5.64)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
347.59k (x3.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
88.08k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
12.24k (x2.66)
TOTAL
198.38k
825.47k (x4.16)
Performance/W
5300U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4