| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i7-4790K


Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i7-4790K gets 215.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 1.1 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
306c3
Core
Lucienne
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
52.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
215.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
26.16k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
14.78k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
6.01k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
5.52k (x1.06)
TOTAL
52.35k
52.47k (x1)

Multithread

5300U

i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
107.76k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
70.84k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
27.99k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
8.87k (x1.93)
TOTAL
198.38k
215.47k (x1.09)

Performance/W
5300U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
805 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
318 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
2448 points/W

Performance/GHz
5300U
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
5946 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
3359 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
11925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4