| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i7-4765T


Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
306c3
Core
Lucienne
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
134.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
15.61k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
8.8k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
3.58k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
3.33k (x0.64)
TOTAL
52.35k
31.31k (x0.6)

Multithread

5300U

i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
66k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
43.27k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
17.39k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
7.88k (x1.71)
TOTAL
198.38k
134.53k (x0.68)

Performance/W
5300U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
3844 points/W

Performance/GHz
5300U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4