Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i5-9600K
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
906ed
Core
Lucienne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
77.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
372.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
30.64k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
26.75k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
6.33k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
14.03k (x2.7)
TOTAL
52.35k
77.75k (x1.49)
Multithread
5300U
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
174.92k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
153.88k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
35.93k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
8k (x1.74)
TOTAL
198.38k
372.74k (x1.88)
Performance/W
5300U
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
1620 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
378 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
3924 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
6661 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
16902 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4