Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i5-8300H
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
906ea
Core
Lucienne
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
23.6k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
21.72k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
4.61k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
6.8k (x1.31)
TOTAL
52.35k
56.72k (x1.08)
Multithread
5300U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
79.12k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
81.27k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
17.46k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
4.62k (x1)
TOTAL
198.38k
182.47k (x0.92)
Performance/W
5300U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4