| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i5-4440


Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-4440 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
306c3
Core
Lucienne
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
138.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
19.08k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
10.47k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
4.53k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
4.21k (x0.81)
TOTAL
52.35k
38.29k (x0.73)

Multithread

5300U

i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
73.26k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
41.01k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
17.12k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
7.3k (x1.59)
TOTAL
198.38k
138.69k (x0.7)

Performance/W
5300U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
872 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
488 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
1651 points/W

Performance/GHz
5300U
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
5783 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
3174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
11604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4