Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
a0655
Core
Lucienne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
68.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
372.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
26.43k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
23.89k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
5.63k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
12.1k (x2.33)
TOTAL
52.35k
68.04k (x1.3)
Multithread
5300U
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
163.14k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
161.5k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
39.94k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
7.6k (x1.65)
TOTAL
198.38k
372.19k (x1.88)
Performance/W
5300U
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
2510 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
117 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
5726 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
6146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5555 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
2814 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
15824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4