Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i5-1038NG7
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
706e5
Core
Lucienne
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
23.2k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
21.2k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
9.4k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
11.54k (x2.22)
TOTAL
52.35k
65.35k (x1.25)
Multithread
5300U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
94.68k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
103.38k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
35.79k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
9.33k (x2.03)
TOTAL
198.38k
243.18k (x1.23)
Performance/W
5300U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4