Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i3-9100
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 1.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
906eb
Core
Lucienne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
229.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
28.03k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
24.5k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
5.73k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
8.48k (x1.63)
TOTAL
52.35k
66.74k (x1.28)
Multithread
5300U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
107.5k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
95.11k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
22.02k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
4.57k (x0.99)
TOTAL
198.38k
229.2k (x1.16)
Performance/W
5300U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
3526 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4