Ryzen 3 5300U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
Both models 5300U and 3600 are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.8 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.8 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
870f10
Core
Lucienne
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
16.04k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
24.47k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
8.38k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
21.66k (x4.17)
TOTAL
52.35k
70.55k (x1.35)
Multithread
5300U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
113.63k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
143.55k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
63.84k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
27.34k (x5.94)
TOTAL
198.38k
348.35k (x1.76)
Performance/W
5300U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4