Ryzen 3 5300U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
810f10
Core
Lucienne
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
14.2k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
23.23k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
5.35k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
5.18k (x1)
TOTAL
52.35k
47.96k (x0.92)
Multithread
5300U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
58.24k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
105.72k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
28.73k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
5.59k (x1.21)
TOTAL
198.38k
198.27k (x1)
Performance/W
5300U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4