| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 5300U vs Ryzen 5 1600


Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.4 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
800f11
Core
Lucienne
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
272.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
13.67k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
22.28k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
4.99k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
15.22k (x2.93)
TOTAL
52.35k
56.16k (x1.07)

Multithread

5300U

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
81.03k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
145.84k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
39.14k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
6.79k (x1.48)
TOTAL
198.38k
272.8k (x1.38)

Performance/W
5300U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
4197 points/W

Performance/GHz
5300U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4