Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i5-1335U
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.4 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.4 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
b06a3
Core
Lucienne
Raptor Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
282.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
37.94k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
26.18k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
13.86k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
14.48k (x2.79)
TOTAL
52.35k
92.46k (x1.77)
Multithread
5300U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
125.7k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
93.63k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
46.18k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
16.75k (x3.64)
TOTAL
198.38k
282.25k (x1.42)
Performance/W
5300U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
18817 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4