Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i3-12100F
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.7 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.7 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
90675
Core
Lucienne
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
39.54k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
23.79k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
11.96k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
13.52k (x2.6)
TOTAL
52.35k
88.81k (x1.7)
Multithread
5300U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
148k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
123.08k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
52.73k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
16.67k (x3.62)
TOTAL
198.38k
340.49k (x1.72)
Performance/W
5300U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4