Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.7 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.7 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
806d1
Core
Lucienne
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2021
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
24.09k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
19.54k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
8.48k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
11.68k (x2.25)
TOTAL
52.35k
63.79k (x1.22)
Multithread
5300U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
220.79k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
225.98k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
79.1k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
11.32k (x2.46)
TOTAL
198.38k
537.18k (x2.71)
Performance/W
5300U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
5300U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4