| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 5300U vs Core i7-1185G7


Description
The 5300U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5300U gets a score of 198.4 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
806c1
Core
Lucienne
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.35k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.38k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5300U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.09k
24.35k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.74k
20.07k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.32k
8.61k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
7.84k (x1.51)
TOTAL
52.35k
60.87k (x1.16)

Multithread

5300U

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
67k
93.58k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
89.94k
94.71k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.84k
33.28k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
9.34k (x2.03)
TOTAL
198.38k
230.91k (x1.16)

Performance/W
5300U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4467 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5996 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2456 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
307 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
13226 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
5300U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3972 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6246 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2190 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
13775 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4