Ryzen 3 3350U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Picasso
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
41.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
352.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
20.92k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
11.87k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.67k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.85k (x0.97)
TOTAL
43.7k
41.31k (x0.95)
Multithread
3350U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
174.59k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
116.47k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
44.79k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
17.1k (x5.19)
TOTAL
144.84k
352.96k (x2.44)
Performance/W
3350U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
832 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
2521 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
3391 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1333 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
11802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4