Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i5-4670K
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4670K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i5-4670K gets 140.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i5-4670K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
42.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
140.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
21.79k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
11.49k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.73k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
4.25k (x1.07)
TOTAL
43.7k
42.25k (x0.97)
Multithread
3350U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
75.9k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
40.88k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
17.08k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
6.32k (x1.92)
TOTAL
144.84k
140.18k (x0.97)
Performance/W
3350U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
203 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
1669 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
i5-4670K
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5735 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
3023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
11120 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4