Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i3-5005U
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-5005U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2.6 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-5005U gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 2.6 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306d4
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
25.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
54.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
11.08k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
9.5k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
2.51k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
2.52k (x0.63)
TOTAL
43.7k
25.61k (x0.59)
Multithread
3350U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
23.11k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
22.79k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
6.06k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
3.03k (x0.92)
TOTAL
144.84k
54.99k (x0.38)
Performance/W
3350U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
1541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
1519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5541 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
4749 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
12804 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4