Ryzen 3 3350U vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.9 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.9 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Barcelo
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
18.57k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
22.03k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
9.55k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
20.5k (x5.15)
TOTAL
43.7k
70.65k (x1.62)
Multithread
3350U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
92.92k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
128.4k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
54.82k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
5.13k (x1.55)
TOTAL
144.84k
281.26k (x1.94)
Performance/W
3350U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4