Ryzen 3 3350U vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The 3350U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3350U gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806c1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.7k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.84k points
137.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3350U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.25k
24.25k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
21.67k
21.63k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
9.09k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.23k (x1.82)
TOTAL
43.7k
62.19k (x1.42)
Multithread
3350U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
46.47k
56.9k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
78.38k
55.68k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.69k
19.29k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.3k
6.09k (x1.85)
TOTAL
144.84k
137.96k (x0.95)
Performance/W
3350U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3098 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
9656 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
3350U
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3787 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6191 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1138 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
12485 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4