Ryzen 3 3300U vs N100
Description
The 3300U is based on Zen+ architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3300U is 1.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3300U is 1.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
b06e0
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
15.23k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
11.04k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
5.54k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
4.98k (x1.03)
TOTAL
40.81k
36.79k (x0.9)
Multithread
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
37.07k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
32.57k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
14.75k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
3.9k (x0.79)
TOTAL
139.56k
88.29k (x0.63)
Performance/W
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4