Ryzen 3 3300U vs Core i7-4500U
Description
The 3300U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4500U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3300U is 2.1 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the i7-4500U gets 66.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3300U is 2.1 times faster than the i7-4500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
40651
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
33.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
66.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
16.67k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
9k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
3.75k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.6k (x0.75)
TOTAL
40.81k
33.02k (x0.81)
Multithread
3300U
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
31.77k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
21.36k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
7.95k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.06k (x1.03)
TOTAL
139.56k
66.14k (x0.47)
Performance/W
3300U
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
2118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
1424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
530 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
4410 points/W
Performance/GHz
3300U
i7-4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
11008 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4