| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3300U vs Ryzen 7 7730U


Description
The 3300U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 7730U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the 7730U gets 345.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7730U is 2.5 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
60.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
345.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
13.41k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
19.44k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
8.41k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
18.92k (x3.92)
TOTAL
40.81k
60.18k (x1.47)

Multithread

3300U

7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
108.82k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
162.53k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
69.08k (x4.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.98k (x1.01)
TOTAL
139.56k
345.4k (x2.47)

Performance/W
3300U
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
7254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
10835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
4605 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
332 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
23027 points/W

Performance/GHz
3300U
7730U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
2979 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
4319 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
1869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
13372 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4