Ryzen 3 3300U vs Ryzen 7 3700U
Description
Both models 3300U and 3700U are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the 3700U gets 157.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700U is 1.1 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the 3700U gets 157.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700U is 1.1 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f81
Core
Picasso
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
38.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
157.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
11.37k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
19.79k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
4.28k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.3k (x0.68)
TOTAL
40.81k
38.75k (x0.95)
Multithread
3300U
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
46.27k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
85.35k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
21.83k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
3.75k (x0.76)
TOTAL
139.56k
157.2k (x1.13)
Performance/W
3300U
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
3085 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
5690 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
1455 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
10480 points/W
Performance/GHz
3300U
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
2842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
4949 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
1070 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
826 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
9687 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4