Ryzen 3 3300U vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Description
The 3300U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7530U is 1.2 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7530U is 1.2 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Barcelo-R
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
171.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
8.81k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
10.18k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
4.31k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
8.66k (x1.8)
TOTAL
40.81k
31.96k (x0.78)
Multithread
3300U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
55.98k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
76k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
34.38k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.04k (x1.03)
TOTAL
139.56k
171.39k (x1.23)
Performance/W
3300U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
11426 points/W
Performance/GHz
3300U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4