Ryzen 3 3300U vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 3300U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3300U gets a score of 139.6 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906a4
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
10240 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.81k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.56k points
185.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
12k
37.56k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
21.13k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
11.35k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
10.31k (x2.14)
TOTAL
40.81k
80.34k (x1.97)
Multithread
3300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.64k
73.97k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
73.99k
72.37k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
29.61k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
9.65k (x1.97)
TOTAL
139.56k
185.6k (x1.33)
Performance/W
3300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
2909 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1135 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
327 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
9304 points/W
12374 points/W
Performance/GHz
3300U
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1266 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1379 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
11661 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4