Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 3250U is based on Zen architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3250U gets a score of 77.9 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Dali
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
33.26k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
77.88k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3250U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.33k
19.34k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.1k
17.47k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.57k
4.08k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.26k
4.04k (x1.24)
TOTAL
33.26k
44.94k (x1.35)
Multithread
3250U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.14k
42.86k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
40.04k
41.3k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
9.69k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
3.68k (x0.74)
TOTAL
77.88k
97.52k (x1.25)
Performance/W
3250U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1476 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2669 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
5192 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
3250U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2667 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4886 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
932 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
9503 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4