Ryzen 3 3200U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Picasso
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
41.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
352.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
20.92k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
11.87k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.67k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
3.85k (x1)
TOTAL
38.85k
41.31k (x1.06)
Multithread
3200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
174.59k (x10.19)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
116.47k (x3.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
44.79k (x4.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
17.1k (x4.18)
TOTAL
61.23k
352.96k (x5.76)
Performance/W
3200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
832 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
2521 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
3391 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1333 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
11802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4