Ryzen 3 3200U vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.3 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
19.17k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
10.55k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.79k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
4.65k (x1.2)
TOTAL
38.85k
39.16k (x1.01)
Multithread
3200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
73.13k (x4.27)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
42.06k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
18.03k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
7.54k (x1.84)
TOTAL
61.23k
140.76k (x2.3)
Performance/W
3200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4