Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.2 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
10.02k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
9.22k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
2.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
4.31k (x1.11)
TOTAL
38.85k
25.6k (x0.66)
Multithread
3200U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
21.75k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
20.51k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
4.97k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5.56k (x1.36)
TOTAL
61.23k
52.78k (x0.86)
Performance/W
3200U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4